Measuring Human Advancement in AI-Mediated Systems
The executive and research brief: seven numbered sections, reports no new results, uses no institutional branding.
For policy & think tanks
Structural requirements for governing persistent AI relationships
This research separates what a person must be able to see, correct, and govern from what a provider executes and what a provider complies with, and asks what continues to shape decisions after a correction is issued.
Human Authority
Structural requirements: what people must remain able to see, understand, correct, govern, carry, and retire.
Consequence
What continues to shape later decisions, access, and institutional action after correction.
Governing Relationship State
A legal framework: lawful continuing reliance as the central governance problem.
Human Agency Policy Framework
The Consequence Revalidation Framework and corrective continuity as policy instruments.
Human-Centric Economic Impact
Design draft v0.1: candidate measurement dimensions for who receives the benefit and who bears the dependency of an AI-mediated gain.
Evidence maps and legal analysis
Related Work is a searchable provenance library of external legal authorities, standards, and scholarly sources, with a published-position matrix. Authority Does Not Travel by Default and Human Agency Under Consequential State develop the legal and institutional analysis behind the policy brief.
This research does not claim to have produced a validated economic index, a released evaluation score, or a proposal ready for adoption without further review. Proposals are derivatives of the research program, not drivers of it.